Megaliths Mysteries Evidence - LexiLine Journal 260

Here is a typical example of WHY the mainstream has not moved
forward on megalithic research. They are bogged down in their own
unproven theories which are not supported by any evidence.

Catherine Perles and Gerard Monthel in their book:
The Early Neolithic in Greece: The first farming communities in
Europe, Cambridge University Press, 2001,
write at Footnote 1, page 2
about theories in archaeology which do not conform to what has
actually been found to be true:

"A more current example is provided by the absence of villages or
habitations in Western European megalithic areas. After a century of
fieldwork, many authors still argue that the megaliths' builders
were necessarily sedentary and that their villages will eventually
be found."

Read that carefully. What it means is that mainstream archaeology is
sticking to its ridiculous theory that the megaliths were
local "cult" objects, sort of a like a sundial in every backyard
lawn, which locals erected to predominantly view the Sun and Moon in
their area. NOTHING supports this view. It is a fiction, a theory in
the imaginations of mainstream archaeologists which has absolutely
no support in the facts.

Rather, as Perles and Monthel correctly note, it is really high time
to look for explanations which fit what the facts tell us. The facts
tell us that the megaliths were put up by some kind of a MOBILE
group which was NOT sedentary to the megalithic locations.

Here again, my theory that this was a worldwide megalithic survey of
the Earth by astronomy by a mobile group of persons specially sent
out on this task - again - DOES fit the facts.